Sunday, December 21, 2008

Black is Black?


So, I've heard this topic discussed on the radio, TV and I've even had a few of my friends call me and pose a question about Barack Obama's "black-ness" (if there is such a thing). The reasoning/logic behind this question is as follows:

The Logic: Because Barack Obama is bi-racial & was raised by whites in a less than urban environment & doesn't use many of the colloquialisms traditionally used by African-Americans in the United States & didn't chase the dime or the shine once graduating from Harvard & confused "Weezie" with "Elizabeth" while holding his heart stating, "this is the big one!"...he isn't really black...at least not as black as most other blacks that live in these United States.

Useful Analogy: There once was a man who decided to have a Bengal tiger as a pet. He got it when it was only a few days old and raised it as a house cat. He fed and loved the tiger as much and many other folks in his neighborhood loved their dogs and goldfish. One day, the police came to his door and informed him that it was against a city ordinance to have an exotic pet at his home. The man tried to explain that "Simba" was not an exotic animal because he had raised him in his home for years. He'd never had any trouble with Simba and the neighbor's kids loved to play with the both of them in his back yard. Simba was de-clawed and had lost all his hunting instincts. Even after showing the officer video tapes to back his claims, Simba could no longer stay in the house because he was, in fact, an exotic animal.

Black Defined: Let's first take a look at the term black, and see if we can get a better historical perspective of what it means to be black in America [and I do question if CNN got it right too]. According to Wikipedia:
"In their attempt to impose segregation and restore white supremacy in the late 19th century, some southern states created laws defining a person as black if the person had any known African ancestry. This was a stricter interpretation than what had prevailed earlier. It became known as the one-drop rule, meaning that a single drop of "black blood" makes a person "black". Some courts called it the traceable amount rule, and anthropologists used to call it the hypodescent rule, meaning that racially mixed persons were assigned the status of the subordinate group."

So, according to the oppressor, if you have any black in you, you are black...period. The entire concept of being black was conceived as a tool to better discriminate, segregate and oppress. The truth is, when we think of it's origin, we ought to be as outraged at the term as we are at the infamous "N-Word", but that's another blog all together.
The ill-dichotomy of the questioning of Barack's black-ness is that I've mostly heard this question raised in black circles. The same circles that would want to march and boycott Hollywood and others for only portraying Blacks in a stereotypical light. We get mad when we are only portrayed as thugs, dope dealers, athletes, rappers, pimps, hoes, ignorant, hyper-sexual, greedy, funny, sexist, etc. and yet we dare to question Barack's authenticity because of his lack of stereotypically inspired black characteristics?!?!? A Bengal tiger is a Bengal tiger regardless of how it was raised and Barack Obama is black because of how the oppressor has defined the term.

But let's see how deep the rabbit hole goes.

I think that the posing of this question is only a symptom, and not the problem. Why would we question Barack's authenticity? Why wouldn't we want him to be black like us? I believe that many of us need to feel that there are certain heights we can not achieve because of the pigmentation of our skin or color class we've been assigned. Many of us need to know that even if we work hard, and do our best, we are destined to some level of failure because of America's history. Logically speaking, if a black man can become president in America, then surely I can become a college graduate or a business owner, or a dedicated father...right? If Barack Husein Obama can have an Oval Office, then I can avoid having an eight by twelve cell...can't I? I am in NO WAY suggesting that Barack's election as our president-elect signals the end of racism, prejudice and injustice in the United States. Quite the contrary. The truth is that America is still infested deep in her bowels, with a cancer that won't be cured with any one election. His election does, however, signify that America is going through a type of chemotherapy and is trying to rid herself of the ills of her past and present. It is my hope, that the day of her remission isn't as far off as I once thought.

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.


Friday, November 14, 2008

The Auto Bailout...


Ok. Here's the "cut to the chase" part. They shouldn't be bailed out.

However, America is dealing with hundreds of "shouldn'ts" already. This doesn't mean I don't think it would be best if congress bails them out.

The Chase...
If you've been in business for, let's say, a hundred years, you should have your act together well enough to stay in business on your own...period. If not, so be it. It's called "Financial Darwinism". I'll bet you didn't see cave men running around talking about "we need to save the dinosaurs from extinction!" (I know that men and dinosaurs were separated by millions of years according to scientists... just making a point;-). However, what happens to all the people that work at the auto plants? And...what happens to all the industries that only exists because there is an "auto plant" in their town. Mercedes built a factory a few miles down the road from where I live. When I toured the facility, the most amazing part wasn't that they roll a new Mercedes off the line every 18 minutes, 24 hours a day. (Keep in mind I toured the plant a few years back and they've expanded since then so now they can produce more than 80 vehicles per day or at least they have the capacity to... that's more than 1,600 per month even with weekends off!!). It wasn't that they think they can sell every last one of them. The most amazing part to me was that every part the the M-Class (except the motor) is made near the area. The seats, dashboards, tires, windshields, radios, antennas, breaks, etc. If they close the M-Class plant in Alabama, many more jobs would be lost than just the ones at the actual plant. Since this is true here, I'm sure this is "the system" by which the auto industry operates in America. Meaning, if a plant closes there will be a "systemic problem". This is why bailing out the "big 3" seems like a necessary evil. But is it?

What if...
What if congress DOESN'T bail them out? What if they all go the way of the dinosaur? I think it could "not be as bad" as we think it'll be...just different. Which would be more "cost effective"? To support, through unemployment benefits and health benefits the workers that have lost their jobs until the industry can "re-tool" or to keep giving the big 3 money so they can keep pretending they're making money from all the cars they obviously ain't selling? The truth is that the CEO's are gonna be financially ok...they already are. So, as long as the "workers" are "ok" do we really care that there is no GM, Ford & Chrystler? In the past 100 years USA can only produce 3 auto makers? Remember "Ma-Bell"? The one phone company model? Long distance, mobile calling, phone features all started to improve when they broke it up and gave some "fresh blood" a chance to enter the market. I think us, the consumers, are over-all better for it.

Resolution...
So, if we do indeed, bailout the Auto Industry, I think it should be done with major quid-pro-quo! And I hope that our government is willing to give the "googles" of the country a shot at making us some "smart cars" so we will "want" to buy and drive American again and I can stop felling guilty about driving my Honda Fit from Japan!

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

"O" the President...



Okay... let me start by saying...wow!

It's November 6, 2008 A.B.
  It's two days after, and it's only now that I'm writing about what we've all witnessed.  I've not blogged in a while.

October 31, 2008
I awoke on this Halloween morning and before I made it to work, I logged onto CheapTickets.com and purchased a round trip ticket to Washington, DC to witness the inauguration that will be held on January 20th.  Once again at work, I used the internet to "confirm" my voting status.

November 3, 2008
After work, I went to Captain D's, got me and my son a meal, helped him with his homework, got him ready for bead, and had him tucked-in just across town at my mom's house.  I returned home, and went to sleep on a mission.

November 4, 2008
I awoke at 3:00 a.m.  I made a liter of coffee, took my fully charged iPod and a chair to my polling site and was surprised that I wasn't the "first" person in line.  Debra was.  She's an attorney/judge that had pulled up 10 prior to me getting there.  

As each hour passed, I called, text'd, twittered, and facebook'd many that I knew.  I was making sure that everyone I knew was alert and aware.

It's 6:30am now and the line that I'm second in, has grown to over 100 people.  The parking lot at the Hueytown Community Center looks like the championship little league game is about to be played.

My friends from the "DC Area" were in line too and called to confirm that they have already voted.  

I spend the rest of the day reassuring people that "we" all can't be denied this time.  I'm pulling up electoral maps, forwarding internet articles, and have forgotten all about my "Obama/Biden" car magnet that was stolen from a Wal-Mart parking lot just 2 days prior.

After work, I stop by the grocery store, pick up some fresh chicken wings, hot dogs & buns and have a fire going by 6pm.   

It's 9:55 p.m. Central Standard Time now.  I'm finished eating my hot dog and wings, I'm done drinking my Red Stripes and American Ales.  My 9 year old son has eaten and has fallen asleep.  At 10:00 p.m. Central Standard Time, I see and hear Wulf Blitzer make the announcement.  "Barack Obama is now the President Elect of The United States of America."  

10:01 A.B. (After Barack)...
It was like watching my son take his first steps.  When he was born, I never doubted he would walk, but the first day he does, it's special.  I thought all that day that Barack Obama would win, but I had no idea of how it would make me "feel".


I first call my mom...few words are spoken.

I then get a call from my sister...few words are spoken.

I then get a call from Sheila...she's in DC and is out in the streets celebrating!  

I receive many calls, texts, emails, and I am unable to answer any of them.  I, too, am taken by the moment.  I'm sitting on my couch, in the living room...in tears.

I watch McCain speak...It's like I hear him but if feel the "response" from his crowd...I am instantly reminded of what hasn't changed.

10:59 p.m. A.B.
President Elect Barack Obama comes onto the stage...
I listen.  I'm speechless.  I'm an American.

November 5, A.B. 6:15 a.m.
I wake up my son and tell him, "good morning."  You'd have to know my son, he opens his eyes and says to me, "what's so good about it?" in a cartoon-ishly sarcastic way.

I tell him that, "Barack Obama is the President! We won, we won!"  He smiles, looks up at me, gets out of his bed and asks, "Pick me up."  He just wanted to be held and picked up by me.  I am once again moved to tears as we embrace.  I make breakfast, pack a lunch and then it's off to the school.

I get to my school, walk into my class and all of my students are sitting quiet with the lights off.  When I walk and turn on the lights, they burst into celebration!  It was a good day.  Once I calmed them down, I start to go around the room and ask them, "what does this mean to them?"  I could only take listen to the 3rd response where Jalaysia says, "this means that I can be what ever I want to be."  I'm moved because, I could have told her this a million times, and now no one has to tell her, and she believes it.

I've been a school teacher for 13 years.  Every morning, we have our morning announcements and then the students say the pledge of allegiance.  This was the 1st time I "wanted" to say it too.


Monday, October 13, 2008

What's a Conservative?


I'm not being funny but I'm having a hard time determining what, exactly, it means to be "a conservative".  I looked it up in Webster's and it says...

1capitalized a: the principles and policies of a Conservative party b: the Conservative party
2 a: disposition in politics to preserve what is established b: a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change ; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage)3: the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change
So, overall, a conservative wants to keep things as they are?  They want to keep "tradition" even if that tradition is fundamentally unsound or unjust?  We as a nation are addicted to oil, so, rather than devoting billions of dollars to "green technologies" we'd rather "drill baby drill" to feed our addiction?  Or, instead of "live and let live" when it comes to gay marriage, we'd rather try and "legislate" what people can and can't  do?  If a marriage is a union between two people and their God, wouldn't this be a "separation of church and state" issue?  Meaning, if you can find a "church" that will marry you, the "state" shouldn't be able to "de-validate" that union... should they?
Over the years, if we had ALL been conservatives, there would still be enslaved Africans in America, no women could vote and alcohol might not go "legally" with our American sporting events as they do now.  America would Royally Suck!  
Many of "us" are clinging to our "traditions" as an excuse to continue to do what we've always done & thus defer any "responsibility" of our current situation to ourselves.  
Useful Analogy:A man graduates high school and finds a "good job" at a plant in his town.  The plant trains him in what he needs to know and becomes a skilled worker and valuable asset to this company.  He works there for 25 years and finds out that this plant will soon close.  He had a son, that is now 18 and has followed in his father's footsteps and found employment at this same plant just last year.  A man and his son now find themselves unable to find work.  Neither the man nor his son, went to college and are finding that the particular "skill set" they possess isn't in demand at any other employer near by.  
In the above analogy, the "tradition" has been to find work without furthering one's education.  The "tradition" has been to not "create" employment, but to "find" employment.  It's the old, "give a man a fish" parable... isn't it?
As a country we can not continue to do what we've done and expect a different result!  There will be NO good economy unless we can "create" employment.  We can't create employment if all of us are only trying to "find" a job.  Some of us are going to have to "make a way" for others to go to work.  
Employers are NOT conservatives as a rule.  Think about it.  Let's take McDonald's for example.  Remember when you would roll to the drive through years ago and who ever took your order was waiting at the window to take your money?  Now, they "might" not be in the window because they all wear headsets now.  This allows them the mobility to take an order more on the fly and also help "fix" the orders.  So now, McDonald's doesn't need that extra person to fix orders.  Also, at McDonalds, years ago when I used to work there they came out with a "clam shell" grill.  This allowed the person working the grill to cook both sides of the meat at once.  I remember being able to cook 24 hamburger patties in less than a minute.  This also meant that you didn't need as many people working the grill as you used to.
We've all seen those "self check out" registers at Wal-Mart and other stores.  Those are "cashiers" that don't have jobs now.  If the companies were more "conservative" they wouldn't invest in such equipment would they?  
Overall, I think instead of looking at things through a "conservative" or "liberal" lens, we should just try to find the "best" ideas and see how we can make this country better for "all" Americans and not just those that hunt and go to church with us.
I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

New Stratagy...

I don't think the McCain Camp is trying to win any more. They do, however, have a "new strategy" they are using. "A strategy to do what?" one might ask. Well, before I go into my "conspiracy theory" on this one...

Useful Analogy:
Well, this isn't so much an analogy as it is an appropriate story that I think will help explain my conspiracy theory. When my sister and brother-in-law lived in Birmingham, they rented a house to some tenants. Well, for what ever reason the tenants couldn't pay their rent any longer and my sister and husband hand to start the eviction process. The tenants eventually left the property but they had all but ransacked the place before they vacated. Holes in the walls, doors detached from hinges and "extra love" left in the toilets. The newly evicted wanted my sister and husband to enjoy their place as little as possible and the former tenants did what they could to ensure that.

New Stategy:
I think that McCain and the republicans, just want the country to be as divided as possible so that the Obama Administration will have a "less effective" term in office. That sucks! I think that John Lewis hit the nail on the head when he siad, "in the not too distant past, there was a governor of the state of Alabama named George Wallace who also became a presidential candidate. George Wallace never threw a bomb. He never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged vicious attacks against innocent Americans who were simply trying to exercise their constitutional rights. Because of this atmosphere of hate, four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama."

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Quit Playing Like You Smart


Ok...I've just about had it with these half-ass pundits!  The proverbial last straw was when I heard Ludacris on Steve Harvey this morning commenting on the 2nd presidential debate.  He was like, "neither candidate impressed me.  I was disappointed with both of their responses."   Are you f__king kidding me?!?!  This from the guy that don't know enough about politics to not make a stupid ass song called "Paint the White House Black" after Obama mentions him in a Rolling Stone article.  If you are as important as you think you are,Luda, you should know that it matters what you say or do to the many "ignorant, uniformed, I'm voting for McCain or Obama because they had a really good TV ad on last night" folks.   At the end of each day, a flock of pundits come on TV and explain to us why we are rejecting John McCain and why we are supporting Barack Obama as if "we" didn't already know.  WTF is a "swing voter" anyway?  And don't even get me started on the polls (I'll be blogging about that later this week;-)!  If you've not made up your mind by now...F_CK YOU FOR REAL!  I'd rather hear somebody say, "I'm voting for McCain because I think Palin is hot!" than to hear somebody say, "I still have by doubts about whether or not Obama is a muslim."  You don't deserve to vote...(unless like, you're just waking up from a coma or something.)  Get on the internet and read something for crying out loud!!!  Find out what each of the candidates are all about on their websites first and then see if you agree with what each of them say they "want" to do.  Fact Check, Fact Check, Fact Check!  Know WHY you are supporting who you're supporting and don't just repeat to me the "talking points" that you've heard the "pundits" spewing the night before.  It just seems like you're trying to "play smart" to the rest of us.

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

VP Debate Results...& The Winner is...


Wow!  First of all, let me say sorry for not "planning ahead".  I waited until about 15 minutes before the debate to print out my "rubric" and found that I was out of ink:-(.  Not to worry though because I just grabbed my handy dandy notebook and pulled up the PDF on the laptop.  After saving the day...I soon found that I wouldn't need it after all.  

Useful Analogy:
Frank and Bob are two "Pop-Warner" Little League Football coaches.  They've both made it to the championship game and have been preparing all week.  This is only Franks second year as a coach but he's found his niche and his team is undefeated.  Bob's been a coach for 10 years.  He's decided to work out a "secret weapon" because he feels that his team only made it to the championship game because the last two teams they played had to forfeit due to injury and angry parent involvement.  It's the day of the game and when Bob yells the secret word..."FAKE-OUT!"...his entire team starts to play by the internationally accepted rules of rugby!  There is such chaos that the referees call the game off and disqualify Bob's team for not adhering to the rules.

Sarah Palin didn't play by the rules...she made up her own.  What a Maverick!  I'm watch this thing and don't even know what to do.  I'm waiting for Gwen Ifill to "referee" and take control.  She, however, found herself under extreme pressure to be "fair" and not appear to "badger the witness" because of her yet released book.  I watch the entire debacle and then I got a phone call from someone asking me what I thought of the debate.   My first thought was..."what debate?"  but I didn't say that because I wanted to know what the person calling thought and I didn't want to "poison the well" with my impression.  She told  that she thought Palin did well.  She said that she was very personable and didn't have any major gaffes.  I instantly thought to myself that I MUST be talking to a person that obviously didn't read "Debate Watching for Dummies."   She did, however, give me her honest opinion and even though she thought Biden "won" the debate, she thought that Palin did well.   Of course, she felt differently after talking to me and hearing what I thought.

What did most of us think was going to happen?  Did we think she was going to do as badly in this debate as she's been doing with Katie Couric?  Did we think we'd get our SNL moment early this week?  Did we think that she would leave the stage in tears after Biden ripped her to pieces?  If that's what you "thought" was going to happen then, she did do well...or maybe I should say she did much better than expected.  If you thought she was going to answer the questions that Gwen Ifill asked and give us all a chance to see "how she thinks" on the fly and under pressure...she was F.U.B.A.R.!  

Now I'm not one for beating a dead horse.  I've been surfing through the "bloggisphere" and reading many opinions of several people that feel that this was a "joke" of a debate.  It feels good to know that many of us can't see "the emperor's new clothes".  I do, however, have a suggestion that I'll be sending in to the Commission on Presidential Debates.  

Debate Suggestion for Future Debates...
I think that there should be at least one question that the candidate themselves get to pose to their opponent.  And also have a chance to ask a follow up to this question.  I think there should be a "team of pundits" to score the response right there at the debate.  If this question is asked first, then the pundits will have the rest of the 90 minutes to mull over the responses and have their verdicts by debate's end and share them with the public.  This way, right there on the spot, a candidate would be "called out" and hopefully somewhat embarrassed for not answering a question or answering a question wrong because  the responses could also be "fact checked" during this time.  The type of question asked would also say something about the candidate.  For example, if Palin had asked Biden how he feels about "hockey mom's getting a special tax credit for buying pucks" we'd all feel a certain way about Palin for asking a question like that, wouldn't we?  Just a suggestion.  If you see something like this used in future debates, know you heard it here first! lol!

Thanks to Natalie for emailing in your rubric and notes;-)  You'll find mine and hers below.

Thedlitical's VP Debate Rubric...

Natalie's VP Debate Rubric & Notes...






Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Debate Watching for Dummies


Debate Watching for Dummies


Ok folks.   One down and three to go.  I watched the first debate with a couple of friends and we discussed what we saw. Then we talked about what we saw the commentators, and pundits talk about which leads me to believe that “we” don’t really know “how to watch a debate.”  So, here are some helpful hints.


Useful Analogy:  Each year, the NFL drafts dozens of college athletes into the pros.  The head coaches of these pro teams hold a NFL Combine each year for potential “draftees” to show their stuff.  This is when many of the coaches make their final decisions on whether or not they’re going to go with one player or the other.  THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THEY HAVE SEEN THE POTENTIAL DRAFTEES!!!  These players have been under the microscope for some time by the coaching staffs of the prospective pro teams.  The combine plays a part in reassuring a choice but not the sole factor in making the choice.


  1. Do your homework. Use all at your disposal to learn as much as possible about each candidate.  You don’t have to become addicted to politics to make an educated choice.  There are several television shows that are dedicated to helping you sort through the “political minutia”.  Try to stay away from shows and networks that are obviously for or against one candidate.  (i.e. don’t watch Fox News at all.  MSNBC has shows that lean democratically.  CNN is overall your best bet in trying to get a “fair” assessment of both sides.)
  2. Stay Neutral. Try and have a "reasonably" open mind.  Don’t look for zingers and one liners by the “guy or gal” you’re in the tank for but try and listen to what each will say about themselves and what they want to do and not so much what they say about their opponent.  Each will try to lead you to believe the other guy has been sent by the devil to carry the country to Hell in a hand basket.
  3. Your opinion counts. Hey, just because Wulf Blitzer and Campbell Brown make a ton of money to give their opinions doesn’t mean theirs are SO MUCH BETTER THAN YOURS!  Opinions are just like ass-holes…we all have them and most of them stink!  It’s easy to believe what they say when the debates are over if you’ve not formed an opinion.  That’s why it’s a good idea to watch with a few others (not a debate party though) so you can have some discussions about the debate with other thinkers.  This is also where knowing how each stands on the issues prior to watching will prove to be helpful.
  4. Body Language. We all deal with people all the time.  We know how it affects our mood depending on how we’re looked at or spoken to.  Watch the facial expressions and movement and gestures of each.  Remember they are people too.  If they look aggravated or bothered to you, they probably are.
  5. Don’t be a Fool! If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.  No matter what either candidate says, they can’t do everything.  No one person can.  They both can only offer ideas and offer plans than they hope they can influence congress and the other departments of the government to work together.
  6. Know the “Tells” This means that each candidate (most people too) do certain things when they get “in trouble” or start to feel uncomfortable.  If you play poker, you’re familiar with this.  There are certain things people do when they have a “good” hand and there are certain things people do when they don’t.  Likewise, people will do or say certain things when they feel they are answering a “good” question or a “bad” one.   If you’ve “done your homework” than you’ve probably seen each of the candidates somewhat uncomfortable with some questions.  Palin tends to ramble and put several talking points together (whether they go together or not).  Biden tends to start of saying “ladies and gentlemen” before he starts to “wing it.”  John McCain tends to call his audience “my friends” when he starts to “play it by ear.”  Obama will start to smile and seem to “enjoy” whatever is happening even more.  Many feel that him saying “uh” a lot is a “tell” but it probably can be more attributed to him trying to be thoughtful and not “mess-up” and stick his foot in his mouth. He seems to be uncomfortable with “awkward silences”.
  7. Who Won? Reguardless what you might think, you shouldn't just go with the "guy" or "gal" you like in the begining and already know "they" won before the debate.  It's best to use some type of Rubric to decide this.  I've inclosed one below.  Just click on it to make it larger and print it out.  Use it as a Score Sheet while watching and then simply add up the points @ the end.  This will be more fun and entertaining if you do this with a friend and average the scores.  This will be even MORE fun if the person(s)  scoring with you is leaning in the opposite direction you are.

I look forward to seeing how you scored the future debates.  i'll include my score sheets as well;-)  If you want to scan you sheets and email them to thed.weezy@gmail.com I'll be sure to post your scores too!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

If It Looks Like a Bailout, and Walks Like a Bailout, Just Because You Put Lipstick on it, Don’t Make it a Pig.

Ok, I’ve been looking at what all of us have been looking at and I’m none to happy about what I’ve been seeing.  Now, to both John McCain’s and Barack Obama’s credit, neither want to see the country go though Financial Armageddon(and that’s what WE have been told repeatedly by several officials)…however, I have my doubts about us providing the needed capital for the financial system to be stabilized. 


Let’s look at the Worst Case Scenario:

  • Markets freeze and NO ONE is able to get credit…period!


Above isn’t a typo… That’s pretty much all I keep hearing.  And that would be bad but…uh…I’ve got like a double digit Beacon Score…so I KNOW living with no credit is possible and not the end of the world.  I DO have to budget and manage my limited money very stringently…which is what we would like our government to do, right?


Once Upon A Time…

I remember having to walk a mile to the bus stop carrying my trumpet and catching the bus every morning in the summers to go to band camp.  After spending my high school years catching buses and bumming rides, it was finally my time to become the owner of my own vehicle.  I remember working at a grocery store and saving every penny until I got like $1,000.  I went to a car auction and I bought a 1980 Honda Prelude…cash.  No car note and no “new car smell”.  This used to be how it went. You SAVED UP to buy what you wanted.  Or, there was lay-a-way…remember that?  Now every store just gives you a credit card and tells you to get it now.  Going into debt has become the “American” way.


So…What are they REALLY scared of?:

Bankruptcy.  Why?  When companies go bankrupt, they sell their assets and get what they can for them.  Our government would rather go into debt with China (which they can choose to re-nig on if need be) then to have China or whatever country that’s currently in the “black” bid for our financial institutions on eBay.


Not being able to continue “life as we know it”.

If the financial system fails to be able to function as it currently does, many tough questions have to be asked and answered.  Questions like, “What ever happened to lay-a-way?”  or “how long will I have to save up before I can buy that?”

I remember when I was a kid, after my mom and dad divorced; my Grandma was able to go to the deep freezer out back and was always able to pull out some “deer meat” or “bass” that my Granddad had hunted earlier that year.  We always had food.  In the backyard, we had pecan trees, pear trees, apple trees, pepper plants, tomato vines, muscadine vines, and fishing bait.  All around the house were not only rose bushes but cabbages and greens too.  My grandparents aren’t rich and didn't use "credit cards" to feed us but when my mom and her four kids had to move back in with them, we all were fed and never did without...what we REALLY needed.  I’ve got one kid and a side by side in the kitchen and I’m looking at CNN everyday and am scared to death… or am I?


There is Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself.

I’ve decided that even if we are about to go through The Great Depression 2.0, I say bring it on!  Everything that doesn’t kill us makes us stronger right?  I say take that $700 billion and pay America's house deeds and had them to us...the tax payers.  That way, if my 401(k) is gone, I'm not still paying a house note.  Hell, while ya'll at it, pay off my student loans too!  Bail "me" out!  

Lead by Example...

I bought a car a couple of years ago and I chose to get a Honda Fit because, at the time, it was one of the most fuel efficient, affordable hatchbacks that wasn’t a hybrid.  That’s what we as Americans have to do… make some difficult choices.  I wanted Hummer just as much as the next guy.  I made a choice based on what I thought I’d be able to afford in the long run.  We might NOT need to purchase a house that is 10 times larger than that of our parents?  I say, let’s take a note from Alaska’s governor and learn to “live off the land” again, fill our deep freezers with as much fresh game as we can and make due.  We’ll all come out better for it in the long run.



**Disclaimer** 

 I'm not an "Economist" nor do I play one on TV, so, uh, to congress and other federal workers and Washington insiders, if you guys read this and know that Financial Armageddon would rain down upon us with a great fury and vengeance not know since the beginning of time... Ix-nay on this Og-blay! lol!